RFQ Recommendation Report
<<insert contract number>> <<insert description of goods/services>>

Summary

TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE (ex GST): If price escalation is linked to CPI, refer to the CPI forecast template for calculations.	Initial Contract Term Value $ Contract Options Value $ Contingency $ Price Escalation $ TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE $
CONTRACT TERM: (i.e., 2 years)
CONTRACT OPTIONS: (i.e., 2 x 12 months) if no options enter NIL
CONTRACT START: (Enter date services are to commence or goods are to be delivered.)
LOCATION OF GOODS/SERVICES TO BE DELIVERED:	Townsville Cairns Other: ____________________________________
RFQ EVALUATION TEAM:	1. 2. 3.
RECOMMENDED SUPPLIER:
SOCIAL PROCUREMENT Select all options that apply to the successful supplier	☐ Local and/or branch supplier (within 125km of where goods or services are being delivered. ☐ First Nation Supplier ☐ Small to Medium Enterprise ☐ Social Enterprise
TERMS AND CONDITIONS: (i.e., PO Terms and Conditions, Existing JCU Contract Conditions, State Government SOA Terms and Conditions)	☐ JCU Purchase Order ☐ JCU Contract (please detail): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ☐ Panel Arrangement (please detail): . . . . . . . . . . . . ☐ Other (please detail): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Recommendation

<<Insert supplier name>> is the preferred supplier to this RFQ.

<<Insert reasons why supplier was selected>>

Description of Goods/Services Required

<<Insert description of goods and/or services being provided by the preferred supplier>>

Responses Received

SUPPLIER NAME	PRICE QUOTED	COMMENTS

Declaration

We declare that:

The panel followed due process in selection of the preferred supplier.

The RFQ process complies with legal obligations. JCU policies and procedures have given due consideration to the Qld Procurement Policy Procurement Principles:

Achieve value for money;

Apply a responsible public procurement approach;

Behave ethically, and embed integrity, probity and accountability;

Be leaders in procurement practice;

Collaborate for more effective outcomes; and

Support strong governance and planning

The evaluation process was free of bias, and any perception of bias. There were no connections between evaluation panel members and any RFQ submissions. Panel members accepted no gifts and had limited contact with suppliers during the evaluation process.

During the evaluation process no conflict of interest (actual, potential or perceived), was declared on any of the received RFQ submissions.

We are confident that all activities, up to this point, can withstand internal or external scrutiny. Furthermore, we believe that this report provides enough information for JCU to make a responsible decision on the matter.

Evaluation Approval

NAME	POSITION	SIGNED	DATE

Must be a minimum of two people for procurement between $50K and $200K.

Financial Delegation Approval

NAME	POSITION	SIGNED	DATE

jcu.edu.au